segunda-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2011
domingo, 25 de dezembro de 2011
sexta-feira, 23 de dezembro de 2011
O que er liberal?
Long before our time, the word liberal meant: leave society alone to manage itself. In economics, it meant laissez-faire and private property. In government, it meant the rule of law. In civic life, it meant more liberty. Freedom was the watchword, the solution to whatever ailed the social order.
Its achievements are chronicled in the pages of this fantastic book, edited by Alan Bullock and Maurice Shock, published first in 1957, in the words of the champions of liberalism in England from the 18th century and forward. Liberalism crushed protectionism. It achieved absolute security of private property, civil liberties for women and Jews, the end of slavery, the establishment of the freedom of association and religion, the end of mercantilism and the institutionalization of free trade, the end of torture and cruelty in penal laws, the hard-core opposition to imperialism, the celebration of the merchant class, the heralding of individualism.
Liberalism’s achievements are magnificent and sweeping. Reading through this volume with its orations and declarations, you can feel your heart racing with excitement. The statism of old was being swept away. In the minds of these great figures, there could never be too much liberty.
And yet the book also documents the change that began to overtake liberalism in the late 19th century, all resulting from what Hans Hoppe has called the great failing of liberalism: its belief that the state could itself be made liberal, benign, and even part of the structure of society itself.
And so you begin to detect a change in the narrative, all based on the myth of the possibility of good government. The first sector to fall is education, as we might expect. Then we have slippage in the area of foreign policy, stemming from the view that the state itself could become the liberator of peoples. World War I then changed everything and liberalism lost its anti-statist core and abandoned laissez-faire in economics.
The book ends with Keynes’s famous essay calling for an end to individualism. “Progress lies in the growth and the recognition of semi-autonomous bodies within the State-bodies whose criterion of action within their own field is solely the public good as they understand it.” He is critical of socialism because it is too enamored with the idea of freedom!
In any case, despite the ending, this is a wonderful collection with great lessons to teach us today. With its focus on English history, it has much to teach Americans about their own history.
Its achievements are chronicled in the pages of this fantastic book, edited by Alan Bullock and Maurice Shock, published first in 1957, in the words of the champions of liberalism in England from the 18th century and forward. Liberalism crushed protectionism. It achieved absolute security of private property, civil liberties for women and Jews, the end of slavery, the establishment of the freedom of association and religion, the end of mercantilism and the institutionalization of free trade, the end of torture and cruelty in penal laws, the hard-core opposition to imperialism, the celebration of the merchant class, the heralding of individualism.
Liberalism’s achievements are magnificent and sweeping. Reading through this volume with its orations and declarations, you can feel your heart racing with excitement. The statism of old was being swept away. In the minds of these great figures, there could never be too much liberty.
And yet the book also documents the change that began to overtake liberalism in the late 19th century, all resulting from what Hans Hoppe has called the great failing of liberalism: its belief that the state could itself be made liberal, benign, and even part of the structure of society itself.
And so you begin to detect a change in the narrative, all based on the myth of the possibility of good government. The first sector to fall is education, as we might expect. Then we have slippage in the area of foreign policy, stemming from the view that the state itself could become the liberator of peoples. World War I then changed everything and liberalism lost its anti-statist core and abandoned laissez-faire in economics.
The book ends with Keynes’s famous essay calling for an end to individualism. “Progress lies in the growth and the recognition of semi-autonomous bodies within the State-bodies whose criterion of action within their own field is solely the public good as they understand it.” He is critical of socialism because it is too enamored with the idea of freedom!
In any case, despite the ending, this is a wonderful collection with great lessons to teach us today. With its focus on English history, it has much to teach Americans about their own history.
O que er liberal?
Long before our time, the word liberal meant: leave society alone to manage itself. In economics, it meant laissez-faire and private property. In government, it meant the rule of law. In civic life, it meant more liberty. Freedom was the watchword, the solution to whatever ailed the social order.
Its achievements are chronicled in the pages of this fantastic book, edited by Alan Bullock and Maurice Shock, published first in 1957, in the words of the champions of liberalism in England from the 18th century and forward. Liberalism crushed protectionism. It achieved absolute security of private property, civil liberties for women and Jews, the end of slavery, the establishment of the freedom of association and religion, the end of mercantilism and the institutionalization of free trade, the end of torture and cruelty in penal laws, the hard-core opposition to imperialism, the celebration of the merchant class, the heralding of individualism.
Liberalism’s achievements are magnificent and sweeping. Reading through this volume with its orations and declarations, you can feel your heart racing with excitement. The statism of old was being swept away. In the minds of these great figures, there could never be too much liberty.
And yet the book also documents the change that began to overtake liberalism in the late 19th century, all resulting from what Hans Hoppe has called the great failing of liberalism: its belief that the state could itself be made liberal, benign, and even part of the structure of society itself.
And so you begin to detect a change in the narrative, all based on the myth of the possibility of good government. The first sector to fall is education, as we might expect. Then we have slippage in the area of foreign policy, stemming from the view that the state itself could become the liberator of peoples. World War I then changed everything and liberalism lost its anti-statist core and abandoned laissez-faire in economics.
The book ends with Keynes’s famous essay calling for an end to individualism. “Progress lies in the growth and the recognition of semi-autonomous bodies within the State-bodies whose criterion of action within their own field is solely the public good as they understand it.” He is critical of socialism because it is too enamored with the idea of freedom!
In any case, despite the ending, this is a wonderful collection with great lessons to teach us today. With its focus on English history, it has much to teach Americans about their own history.
Its achievements are chronicled in the pages of this fantastic book, edited by Alan Bullock and Maurice Shock, published first in 1957, in the words of the champions of liberalism in England from the 18th century and forward. Liberalism crushed protectionism. It achieved absolute security of private property, civil liberties for women and Jews, the end of slavery, the establishment of the freedom of association and religion, the end of mercantilism and the institutionalization of free trade, the end of torture and cruelty in penal laws, the hard-core opposition to imperialism, the celebration of the merchant class, the heralding of individualism.
Liberalism’s achievements are magnificent and sweeping. Reading through this volume with its orations and declarations, you can feel your heart racing with excitement. The statism of old was being swept away. In the minds of these great figures, there could never be too much liberty.
And yet the book also documents the change that began to overtake liberalism in the late 19th century, all resulting from what Hans Hoppe has called the great failing of liberalism: its belief that the state could itself be made liberal, benign, and even part of the structure of society itself.
And so you begin to detect a change in the narrative, all based on the myth of the possibility of good government. The first sector to fall is education, as we might expect. Then we have slippage in the area of foreign policy, stemming from the view that the state itself could become the liberator of peoples. World War I then changed everything and liberalism lost its anti-statist core and abandoned laissez-faire in economics.
The book ends with Keynes’s famous essay calling for an end to individualism. “Progress lies in the growth and the recognition of semi-autonomous bodies within the State-bodies whose criterion of action within their own field is solely the public good as they understand it.” He is critical of socialism because it is too enamored with the idea of freedom!
In any case, despite the ending, this is a wonderful collection with great lessons to teach us today. With its focus on English history, it has much to teach Americans about their own history.
segunda-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2011
sexta-feira, 16 de dezembro de 2011
Fw: Geisel e Lula
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 2:56 AM
Subject: Geisel e Lula
URL: http://rodrigoconstantino.blogspot.com/2011/12/geisel-e-lula.html
Carlos Alberto Sardenberg, O GLOBO
Não foi por acaso que parte da esquerda brasileira encantou-se com a política econômica do presidente Ernesto Geisel, na década de 70. O general, que trazia uma bronca dos americanos, tinha uma visão muito ao gosto da chamada ala desenvolvimentista da América Latina: o Estado comanda as atividades, investindo, financiando, subsidiando, autorizando (ou vetando) os negócios e a atuação de empresas. Mais ainda: com a força das estatais e seus bancos, o governo organiza companhias para atuar em determinadas áreas.
O presidente Geisel, claro, tinha mais poderes do que os governantes da democracia. Todos os setores importantes da economia estavam nas mãos de estatais, de modo que o controle era mais direto. Além disso, havia o AI-5. Quando o presidente dizia a um empresário ou banqueiro o que deveria fazer, a proposta, digamos assim, tinha uma força extra.
Mas Lula arranjou um modo de recuperar o modelo, no que foi apoiado e seguido por Dilma. Geisel, por exemplo, era o dono da Vale. Lula não era, mas pressionou a mineradora, impôs negócios e terminou substituindo o presidente da companhia. Geisel montou as famosas companhias da área petroquímica, tripartites, constituídas por uma empresa estrangeira, uma nacional privada e uma estatal, na base do um terço cada. Aliás, convém notar: não faltaram multinacionais interessadas. O capital não se move por ideologia, mas por... dinheiro. Devia ser um bom negócio entrar num país sem competição, com apoio de um governo local que não devia satisfações ao Legislativo, ao Judiciário ou à imprensa.
Do mesmo modo, as multinacionais do petróleo, hoje, vão topar (ou não) o novo modelo de exploração do pré-sal não por motivos políticos, mas pela possibilidade de ganhar (ou não) dinheiro.
Lula, no regime democrático, substituiu o AI-5 pela ampla base partidária, cooptada e/ou comprada com vantagens e cargos. Na economia, sobraram instrumentos poderosos, como os bancos públicos, especialmente o braço armado de empréstimos especiais do BNDES. Além disso, em um país de carga tributária tão elevada, qualquer redução dá uma vantagem enorme ao setor escolhido. O governo Lula-Dilma usa e abusa desse recurso.
Geisel ampliou a ação da Petrobras, levando-a à petroquímica, ao comércio externo e ao varejo dos postos de gasolina. O presidente Lula também mandou a Petrobras ampliar seus negócios e tratou de devolver à estatal parte do poder que perdera com a lei do petróleo de 1997, colocando-a como dominante no pré-sal.
Geisel tocou grandes obras, grandes projetos. Lula, idem. Não é coincidência que o petista tenha retomado usinas nucleares que constavam do Brasil Potência do general. Geisel tinha outra grande vantagem. Na época, não tinha licença ambiental, não tinha Ministério Público, nem sindicatos, nem juízes, nem ONGs para suspender obras.
Já Lula e Dilma passam o tempo todo tentando driblar esses "estorvos", mas vai tudo mais devagar. Inclusive porque a repartição do governo por critérios partidários retira eficiência da administração, abre espaço para a corrupção.
O governo Geisel deixou uma ampla coleção de cemitérios fiscais e empresariais. Sua presidência beneficiou-se da estabilidade promovida pelas reformas da dupla Bulhões/Roberto Campos, no governo Castello Branco, e de uma conjuntura mundial favorável. Enquanto o Brasil conseguiu financiamento externo, com os bancos internacionais passando para os países em desenvolvimento os petrodólares, a juros baratos, o modelo ficou de pé. Com a crise mundial dos anos 70, com inflação e recessão, consequência da alta dos preços do petróleo, de alimentos e, em seguida, do choque de juros, a fonte secou e o Brasil quebrou.
Resultaram estatais tão grandes quanto ineficientes. E empresas privadas que não resistiam à menor competição. Sem as tetas do governo, simplesmente sumiram, deixando empresários ricos e uma conta para o contribuinte.
Convém pensar nisso quando Lula e Dilma forçam os bancos públicos a ampliarem seus financiamentos. Quando levam a Petrobras e empresas privadas a investimentos provavelmente acima de suas capacidades. Ou quando o governo toca essas obras enormes, como a transposição do Rio São Francisco ou o trem-bala.
Como Geisel, Lula também herdou uma estabilidade construída pela administração anterior e se beneficiou de um ambiente internacional extremamente favorável.
O ambiente internacional está mais hostil. E já são visíveis alguns ossos de esqueletos: obras atrasadas e mais caras, investimentos ficando pelo caminho, indústrias locais protegidas (e ineficientes), gasto público elevado, desequilíbrios econômicos voltando, como a persistente inflação.
terça-feira, 6 de dezembro de 2011
quarta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2011
quarta-feira, 16 de novembro de 2011
terça-feira, 15 de novembro de 2011
sexta-feira, 11 de novembro de 2011
terça-feira, 8 de novembro de 2011
domingo, 6 de novembro de 2011
sábado, 5 de novembro de 2011
sexta-feira, 4 de novembro de 2011
quinta-feira, 3 de novembro de 2011
quarta-feira, 2 de novembro de 2011
terça-feira, 1 de novembro de 2011
domingo, 30 de outubro de 2011
Fw: Horowitz: The Truth About Occupy Wall Street
----- Original Message -----
From: Vision to America
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 4:05 PM
Subject: Horowitz: The Truth About Occupy Wall Street
 |
 Dear Fellow Conservative:  The Occupy Wall Street crowd says that it represents "the 99 percent." But what percentage of this movement really wants a better life for the people of this country who have been hurt by the economic policies of the current administration? Is it the 45 percent who recently told pollsters that they feel capitalism "can't be saved"? Or the 35 percent who said that the U.S. government is "no better than al Qaeda"? Or the 31 percent willing to engage in violence to support its agendas? Is it the members of the Communist Party USA who helped organize the OWS demonstrations in Los Angeles and received a loud ovation when they addressed the OWS demonstrators in Chicago? Or the members of the American Nazi Party who supports the OWS movement because some protestors have a similar view about the evil of "Jew bankers"? No, the "99 percent" does not represent the majority. Not even close. It is the same small fraction of leftists who have been looking for a vehicle to launch a fatal attack on the foundations of America since the 1960s. But the media are buying their story about representing middle America, and Barack Obama and the Democrats are cynically using them to further the class warfare they are waging. That's why the Freedom Center is rushing Occupy Wall Street: The Enemy Within into publication. For your immediate donation of $25, $50, $100, $250 or more to the Freedom Center, I'll send you a copy of this critical pamphlet as soon as it's off the press. This pamphlet gives chapter and verse about OWS. It shows how its demands—for "open borders"; for $1 trillion to be expended in "ecological restoration"; for forgiveness of "all debt on the entire planet"; among other things—are a dagger pointed at the heart of capitalism. It tells the inside story of how corrupt groups such as ACORN and the Service Employees International Union helped create and sustain this movement. Most of all, it shows exactly what the "Occupy" movement wants—to promote extreme levels of governmental and economic destabilization; to create social unrest in the U.S. and throughout the democratic world; and to form alliances with other radical causes, including the anti-Israel movement. I came out the Left; I know how it works and why it must be stopped. And I know that the people behind Occupy Wall Street—the leaders and strategists, not the flash mobs of useful idiots they manipulate—are not just middle class Americans venting their frustrations. They represent an orchestrated attack on the foundations of our nation; an effort to replace our system with one in which the accumulation of wealth—and all the social goods it creates in terms of jobs and prosperity—is no longer possible. The Freedom Center has undertaken a critical mission—to educate Americans of the danger the Left poses to our society. That's why I am urging you to help us disseminate Occupy Wall Street: The Enemy Within as widely as possible. We must not allow the main stream media and the Obamaites desperate for the President's re-election to win this battle by portraying these protestors as idealists who want to make America "fairer" and "more just" when in reality they want to radically transform our country into a place we will not recognize as our own! We plan to mail 250,000 copies of Occupy Wall Street: The Enemy Within in the next 30 days to journalists, politicians, and impressionable college students. But to get the truth out about this malicious movement, we need your help. I ask that you be as generous as possible in helping us fund this critically important publication. I will of course send you a free copy of Occupy Wall Street: The Enemy Within and keep you updated via email as the Freedom Center continues to monitor this movement. Please follow this link to make your most generous contribution right now. The light of the truth is the best disinfectant. Please help us shine that light who is behind Occupy Wall Street and what they want. Please help us get Occupy Wall Street: The Enemy Within into as many hands as possible. Sincerely,  David Horowitz President & Founder P.S. Help the Freedom Center get the truth out about the Occupy Wall Street Movement by making the most generous contribution you can afford right now. Every dollar you are able to give will go towards printing and distributing 250,000 copies of our new pamphlet, Occupy Wall Street: The Enemy Within, to journalists, politicians, and impressionable college students. Don't forget that I'll send you a free copy for your donation. Thanks—David 
|
quinta-feira, 27 de outubro de 2011
about stealing how liberal like
In Exodus 20:15, God's Law states, "Thou shalt not steal."
This law applies to every person in every society, from peasants to
presidents. Liberals, however, would disagree. They believe it is okay to
steal from a prosperous man so they can buy a vote from a lazy man.
When governments take more from one group of people than they take from
another group of people, the takers will eventually outvote the givers. This
is taxation without representation. Our founders believed this was theft and
fought a war of Independence to end it.
This new T-shirt by Patriot Gear makes the point that the Government is
breaking God's Law by stealing our hard-earned money.
We've changed the old English word "shalt" to the more modern version,
"shall."
Why not wear this shirt to the Occupy Wall Street Protests and watch those
lawless flea-baggers squirm!
Fw: Raising Cain: Herman's New Book Scares Establishment
----- Original Message -----
From: Patriot Depot
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 3:33 PM
Subject: Raising Cain: Herman's New Book Scares Establishment
Please add mail@patriotdepot.com to your address book. Thanks! If you found this message in your junk or spam folder please mark as "Not Spam"
Having trouble viewing this message? Click here to view online | Forward this message to a friend
Having trouble viewing this message? Click here to view online | Forward this message to a friend
 |
| This Is Herman Cain! |
 Herman Cain's candidacy is currently outpacing such high profile candidates as Newt Gingrich, Michele Bachmann, Ron Paul, and Tim Pawlenty in growth and support, registering third in overall popularity among Republican voters in a recent Gallup poll. Here, in this memoir, Cain answers his most often-asked question: Who is Herman Cain? Growing up poor in the segregated south, Cain describes how he pulled himself out of the depths of poverty and became successful the old-fashioned way. Through college, a stint as a Navy mathematician, working at the Pillsbury company and becoming its youngest ever vice president, and eventually serving as the CEO of Godfather's Pizza, Herman Cain relied on self-motivation and determination to get where he is today His strong beliefs and values have helped him in his career and personal life, and he reveals his self-made secrets in this memoir. Motivated by his children, grandchildren, and his many supporters, Cain announced his candidacy in May 2011, and the nation watches as he joins the growing number of Republicans duking it out for their party's nomination in 2012. |
| RETAIL |
| Government Hates Competition T-Shirt |
 In Exodus 20:15, God's Law states, "Thou shalt not steal." This law applies to every person in every society, from peasants to presidents. Liberals, however, would disagree. They believe it is okay to steal from a prosperous man so they can buy a vote from a lazy man.  When governments take more from one group of people than they take from another group of people, the takers will eventually outvote the givers. This is taxation without representation. Our founders believed this was theft and fought a war of Independence to end it. This new T-shirt by Patriot Gear makes the point that the Government is breaking God's Law by stealing our hard-earned money. We've changed the old English word "shalt" to the more modern version, "shall." Why not wear this shirt to the Occupy Wall Street Protests and watch those lawless flea-baggers squirm! |
| RETAIL Color:Black ∗ Gildan Ultra Cotton ∗ 99%-Cotton 1%-Preshrunk Polyester ∗ Available in Small-XXXL |
| Don't Tread On Me Camo Cap |
 Don't Tread On Me classic now in camouflage with mesh back and adjustable velcro strap. Camo pattern provided by Realtree AP. 60% Cotton, 40% Polyester. |
| RETAIL Begins Shipping October 31st |
| Suicide of a Superpower |
 Will America Survive to 2025? America is disintegrating. The "one Nation under God, indivisible" of the Pledge of Allegiance is passing away. In a few decades, that America will be gone forever. In its place will arise a country unrecognizable to our parents. This is the thrust of Pat Buchanan's The author of six New York Times bestsellers traces the disintegration to three historic changes: America's loss of her cradle faith, Christianity; the moral, social, and cultural collapse that have followed from that loss; and the slow death of the people who created and ruled the nation. America was born a Western Christian republic, writes Buchanan, but is being transformed into a multiracial, multicultural, multilingual, multiethnic stew of a nation that has no successful precedent in the history of the world. Where once we celebrated the unity, the melting pot and shared experience, that the Depression and World War gave us, our elites today proclaim, "Our diversity is our greatest strength!"-even as racial, religious, and ethnic diversity are tearing nations to pieces. Rejecting the commitment to a God-given equality of rights for all as inadequate, our government is engaged in the manic pursuit of equality of rewards, as it seeks to erect an egalitarian utopia that has never before existed. Less and less do we Americans have in common. More and more do we fight over religion, morality, politics, history, and heroes. And as our nation disintegrates, our government is failing in its fundamental duties, unable to defend our borders, balance our budgets, or win our wars. How Americans are killing the country they profess to love, and the fate that awaits us if we do not turn around, is what Suicide of a Superpower is all about. |
| RETAIL Hardcover book, 496 Pages ∗ Begins Shipping November 1st |
| No, We Can't: Radical Islam, Militant Secularism and the Myth of Coexistence |
 The world is shifting. It is dissatisfied, baffled and craving transformation. Religious tolerance is prized more than truth. From clever slogans to celebrity endorsements, we are bombarded with seemingly peaceful messages of coexistence. But beneath the bumper stickers and T-shirts is buried this truth: Coexistence is a myth. Instead, a war for world domination is raging--between radical Islam, secularism and Judeo-Christianity. What does it mean for you and why should you care? From years of global outreach, Robert Stearns predicts a coming perilous culture clash. With clarity and astonishing depth, he shows you
|
| NOW ONLY $14.95 ∗ ORDER NOW |
| © 2011 The Patriot Update & The Patriot Depot - A Division of Liberty Alliance, LLC Customer Support: (800) 678-3915 3150-A Florence Rd ∗ Suite #1 ∗ Powder Springs, GA 30127 |
quarta-feira, 26 de outubro de 2011
segunda-feira, 24 de outubro de 2011
domingo, 23 de outubro de 2011
quarta-feira, 19 de outubro de 2011
terça-feira, 18 de outubro de 2011
domingo, 16 de outubro de 2011
sexta-feira, 14 de outubro de 2011
Mais uma vitima do Groupon
Lesado pelo Groupon: Comprei 2 tablets do Grupon um há 115 dias e outro há 90 dias, paguei e não me entregaram os produtos. Sinto lesado ao ter meu dinheiro tomado. Assim acho que não mais irei comprar na internet. Mas reclamarei todos os dias contra o Groupon que me enganou. Vou reclamar deles eternamente. Quero meus produtos.
quinta-feira, 13 de outubro de 2011
Vítima do Groupon.
Lesado pelo Groupon: Comprei 2 tablets do Grupon um há 115 dias e outro há 90 dias, paguei e não me entregaram os produtos. Sinto lesado ao ter meu dinheiro tomado. Assim acho que não mais irei comprar na internet. Mas reclamarei todos os dias contra o Groupon que me enganou. Vou reclamar deles eternamente. Quero meus produtos.
quarta-feira, 12 de outubro de 2011
terça-feira, 11 de outubro de 2011
domingo, 9 de outubro de 2011
domingo, 2 de outubro de 2011
Ron Paul: O único em que nós podemos acreditar
Vania gostaria que voce assistisse este video.
http://www.libertarianismo.org/index.php/videos/75-ron-paul/315-ron-paul-o-unico-em-que-nos-podemos-acreditar
http://www.libertarianismo.org/index.php/videos/75-ron-paul/315-ron-paul-o-unico-em-que-nos-podemos-acreditar
sexta-feira, 30 de setembro de 2011
quinta-feira, 29 de setembro de 2011
quarta-feira, 28 de setembro de 2011
terça-feira, 27 de setembro de 2011
segunda-feira, 26 de setembro de 2011
Fw: LOCAL REQUISITADO!
----- Original Message -----
From: Cicero Alves Filho
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 12:35 AM
Subject: Fw: LOCAL REQUISITADO!
----- Original Message -----
From: Robson Miranda
To: natercia41@hotmail.com ; tp-miranda@bol.com.br ; coral007_@hotmail.com ; myrnamoura@ig.com.br ; daniela-mohaupt@uol.com.br ; danimohaupt@oi.com.br ; tamine_mota@hotmail.com ; damaris_re@yahoo.com.br ; demofilho@uol.com.br ; claudiasymone@hotmail.com
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:32 PM
Subject: LOCAL REQUISITADO!
Receba GRÁTIS as mensagens do Messenger no seu celular quando você estiver offline. Conheça o MSN Mobile! Crie já o seu!
sexta-feira, 23 de setembro de 2011
quinta-feira, 22 de setembro de 2011
quarta-feira, 21 de setembro de 2011
Fw: Vania Maria Alves compartilhou um link no seu Mural.
----- Original Message -----
From: Facebook
To: Cicero Filho
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 4:58 PM
Subject: Vania Maria Alves compartilhou um link no seu Mural.
 |
terça-feira, 20 de setembro de 2011
segunda-feira, 19 de setembro de 2011
domingo, 18 de setembro de 2011
sábado, 17 de setembro de 2011
sexta-feira, 16 de setembro de 2011
quinta-feira, 15 de setembro de 2011
quarta-feira, 14 de setembro de 2011
Juliano Torres: Minha alternativa ao voto distrital
Juliano Torres: Minha alternativa ao voto distrital: Não entrando no mérito do voto distrital ser bom ou ruim, ele com certeza está na agenda do momento e a caminho de ser votado pelo congresso...
segunda-feira, 12 de setembro de 2011
domingo, 11 de setembro de 2011
Juliano Torres: Como o Zimbabwe se livrou da hiperinflação
Juliano Torres: Como o Zimbabwe se livrou da hiperinflação: O Zimbabwe ficou conhecido no mundo todo por diversas matérias na imprensa nas quais o país era colocado como um exemplo do que pior pode se...
Juliano Torres: Os mitos do capitalismo
Juliano Torres: Os mitos do capitalismo: Os mitos mais comuns do capitalismo com certeza são que ele causou a grande depressão e que gera desigualdade, como alegam ter sido após a r...
Juliano Torres: Duas ideias para melhorar a segurança no Brasil
Juliano Torres: Duas ideias para melhorar a segurança no Brasil: O problema de segurança no Brasil é algo dramático e por isso eu vou palpitar sobre duas ideias simples pra que a coisa possa melhorar. Não ...
Juliano Torres: A realidade: os pobres exploram os ricos
Juliano Torres: A realidade: os pobres exploram os ricos: Estava lendo um post do Luiz Mário Brotherhood e ele destacou uma citação do Leonard Peikoff no qual ele mostra que ao contrário do mito de ...
sábado, 10 de setembro de 2011
quarta-feira, 7 de setembro de 2011
terça-feira, 6 de setembro de 2011
segunda-feira, 5 de setembro de 2011
sábado, 3 de setembro de 2011
sexta-feira, 2 de setembro de 2011
quinta-feira, 1 de setembro de 2011
quarta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2011
terça-feira, 30 de agosto de 2011
segunda-feira, 29 de agosto de 2011
sexta-feira, 26 de agosto de 2011
quarta-feira, 24 de agosto de 2011
terça-feira, 23 de agosto de 2011
domingo, 21 de agosto de 2011
quarta-feira, 17 de agosto de 2011
Emailing: Twitter - Home.htm
CORRUPÇÃO no Brasil é a tragédia dentro da tragédia deveria ser tipificada como crime hediondo. Impoē-se punição aos irresponsáves. Lei já.
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)